SOFT - TIAFT 1998 Poster Session 2 Wednesday October 7, 1998
COMPARISON OF DERIVATIZING REAGENTS AND INTERNAL STANDARDS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF OPIATES

Mitzi M. Rettinger, Chris J. Jones, Michael A. Re, Joe B. Rettinger, Art S. Zisman

Radian International LLC, P.O. Box 201088, Austin, TX, 78720-1088, USA

There are a number of problems associated with confirmation analysis of opiates. Some issues that have plagued laboratories are incomplete derivatization, "dirty" derivatives, enolization of the ketones in hydrocodone and hydromorphone, and labeled internal standards interfering with the ions of the target drug. Now with the higher cut-off mandated by SAMHSA, an additional problem has arisen - at higher concentrations target drug ions contribute significantly more to internal standard ions resulting in failed ratios.

This study explores differences in derivatizing reagents and internal standards in opiate analysis. Compounds included were morphine (-D3, -D6), codeine (-D3, -D6), hydromorphone (-D3), hydrocodone (-D3, -D6), and oxycodone (-D3, -D6). In our study we evaluated three derivatives (TFA, TMS, and PPA) and nine internal standards. All samples were analyzed by GC/MS/SIM unextracted for the amount of derivatization as well as for enolization of the ketones.

Although extracted samples have shown otherwise, the results suggested that the derivative with least amount of enolization was TMS using BSTFA with 1% TMCS. The derivative with the most complete derivatization was also TMS. Unfortunately, TMS derivatives of opiates also have more ion interferences. These coincident ions can cause problems on the low and high ends of calibration curves especially with the new cut-off. The derivative that appears to have the fewest interferences is the TFA using TFAA. Overall the internal standards that are more highly labeled provided less contribution to the target drug ions. The unlabeled drug ions also contributed less to higher labeled internal standard ions. This means fewer problems on both ends of the calibration curves.

Albuquerque logo
Previous Abstract
Wednesday Index

TIAFT '98 Homepage

TIAFTnet Homepage

Albuquerque logo
Next Abstract


Further information: tiaft98@aol.com or spiehleraa@aol.com
TIAFT & CBFT 1995 - 1997 All Rights Reserved